XbowTM "Straight to the Target when Straight is the TargetTM"
This website features three techniques aimed at improving efficiency in orthodontics. These are: 1. The XbowTM Class II Corrector, 2. Indirect bonding with a hybrid tray and flowable light cured adhesive, and 3. The CAAPP system of brackets.
Updated May 3, 2008
Dr. Greg Barnett's research on the Xbow has been accepted for publication in the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Date to be announced.


XbowTM shown with ForsusTM Fatigue Resistant Device EZ Module with 25 mm pushrods and Gurin Locks from 3M Unitek and Spring Caps from Comfort Solutions Inc.

RME with bonded occlusal rests on second molars Triple "L" ArchTM with bonded occlusal rests
The XbowTM Class II Corrector is protected by the following patents:
3M Unitek's Orthodontic Perspectives has an article on Xbow and one on ForsusTM by Dr. Bob Miller.
Volume XIII, No. 2, Invitation to Efficiency
Great Lakes Orthodontics, LTD. has the exclusive license to fabricate Xbows in the United States.
IACT's CasePresenterOrthodontics™ now includes Xbow and Forsus.
Broadway Orthodontic Laboratories, Ltd. has been given a license to fabricate Xbows in Canada. The address is #1402-805 West Broadway, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1K1. Phone (604)872-6656.
Preferred Ortho Dental Laboratory has been given a license to fabricate Xbows in Canada. The address is #207, 14065 Victoria Trail, Edmonton, Alberta, T5Y 2B6. Phone (780)490-6585.
Archform Orthodontics has been given a license to fabricate Xbows in Australia.
The address is
Extreme Dental Laboratories Inc. has been given a license to fabricate Xbows in Canada. The address is 87 Thornmount, Unit 27, Toronto, Ontario, M1B 5S5. Phone (416)286-0111 or 1-888-237-5950.
A hybrid appliance called “XbowTM”( “CrossbowTM”) has been developed that connects a maxillary expansion appliance to a mandibular lingual arch with the ForsusTM Fatigue Resistant Device for phase one treatment in the late mixed dentition or early permanent dentition. It is an alternative to the HerbstTM Appliance for the treatment of Class II malocclusions in children and adolescents.
Once the dust clears it looks like there are only two things that help a corrected Class II malocclusion remain Class I (other than indefinite retention with a "passive activator") They are: 1. The fact that the mandible outgrows the maxilla, and, 2. A socked-in buccal occlusion, and more importantly, socked-in first bicuspids. Dr. Herbst had it figured out by 1905.
In Dr. Casko's 1 landmark cephalometric study he showed wide ranges of dental and skeletal variation in individuals with untreated ideal occlusions. He showed that when the ANB angle is high (up to 8 degrees), the incisors are normally more upright in the maxilla (down to 93 degrees) and more protrusive in the mandible (up to106 degrees).
It appears that mandibular propulsive appliances offer no significant advantages over other appliances.
Dr. Carlos Flores-Mir, a
Clinical Associate Professor
at the University of Alberta Orthodontic Graduate Program, and Director, Cranio-facial
& Oral-health Evidence-based Practice Group (COEPG) (http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/ortho/nav02.cfm?nav02=27929&nav01=10601),
states: "As shown in a published systematic review (http://www.angle.org/pdfserv/i0003-3219-077-02-0376.pdf),
the effects produced by the bonded Herbst appliance are significantly
dentoalveolar. Some "headgear effect" and changes in mandibular length were
reported but they are not likely clinically significant. No good evidence was
reported for long term changes.
In systematic reviews of the effects of fixed (http://www.angle.org/pdfserv/i0003-3219-076-04-0712.pdf)
and removable
(http://www.angle.org/pdfserv/i0003-3219-076-05-0876.pdf)
functional appliances, there were no profile soft tissue changes when normal
expected facial growth was factored out.
Xbow is an appliance system based on:
1. Targeting a Class I first bicuspid relationship by overcorrecting the maxillary first bicuspids from Class II to a half cusp Class III and utilizing the bite-catching effect of the first bicuspids as the distalized teeth rebound mesially and occlusally.
2. Use of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device for automatic/non-compliance Class II correction to shorten treatment time in phase one and phase two.
3. Incorporating maxillary sutural expansion and mandibular “e” space preservation with Class II correction.
4. Opening space for the maxillary canines without proclining the maxillary incisors.
5. Reducing the time in full edgewise appliances and especially the time that the upper incisors are retracted with edgewise appliances to reduce root resorption 2,5,9 and decalcification.
6. Preventing maxillary occlusal canting that occurs when a unilateral Forsus device is used with a full edgewise appliance in asymmetric Class II cases. The tipping of the buccal segment occlusal plane with Xbow encourages the bite-catching effect of the first bicuspids.
The advantages that the Xbow has over the Herbst are:
1. The use of six ordinary bands instead of crowns or reinforced bands. This is possible because of a consistent force from the Forsus device that bands can withstand and the fact that the Forsus device acts as a stress breaker.
2. The Forsus device allows measurable forces of approximately 200 grams or less to be placed on the teeth on one or both sides for as long as it takes to achieve the desired overcorrection. This is handy in asymmetrical Class II cases where the Forsus device is left on one side for a longer time.
3. Forsus devices can be placed in cases with a full cusp Class II molar and little overjet where the canines are blocked out.
4. The Forsus device allows the mandible to function in centric relation with the condyles seated.
The advantages that the Xbow has over maxillary first bicuspid and Nance anchorage to distalize maxillary first molars are:
1. The maxillary first bicuspid is distalized with the Xbow and mesialized with maxillary first bicuspid and Nance anchorage.
2. Space is opened for the maxillary canines with the Xbow and closed with maxillary first bicuspid and Nance anchorage.
3. With maxillary first bicuspid and Nance anchorage once the maxillary molars are distalized, you must "maintain the gain". This requires placing a Nance to the molars, waiting for the first bicuspids to relapse distally, placing full edgewise appliances, opening space for the maxillary canines, and finally, removing the Nance and using anchorage such as headgear, Class II elastics or Forsus devices to retract the maxillary incisors. Why not use the Forsus device on a Xbow in the first place?
Xbow Lectures
A special welcome to those orthodontists who have attended my lectures at the GLAO, MASO, PCSO, Angle Society, Arizona Orthodontic Study Club, Atlantic Association of Orthodontists, North Virginia Orthodontic Study Club, University of Alberta, University of Toronto, Toronto Orthodontic Club, or in Park City, Whistler, Montreal, Ottawa, Calgary, Williamsburg, Saskatoon, or Newport, Rhode Island.
Thanks to Dr. Bob Miller and Dr. Carlos Flores-Mir for their Xbow lectures.
Xbow Related Research
The orthodontic graduate students at the University of Alberta, University of Toronto, and University of Western Ontario are treating patients with Xbow.
Dr. Greg Barnett at the University of Alberta compared 67 consecutively treated Xbow patients to non-treated controls. The Forsus device was in place for an average of 4.5 months. The T2 cephs were taken 6.4 months after Forsus removal on average. The lower incisors proclined an average of 3.8 degrees and came forward 1.2 mm after growth was factored out. No other appliance was used. This compares favorably to Herbst treatment.
Dr. Carlos Flores-Mir has begun a prospective randomized clinical trail using a 3D dental, skeletal, and facial volumetric analysis of Xbow patients.
Dr. Bob Miller compared 8 two phase Herbst cases with 7 two phase Xbow cases and 7 single phase Forsus cases.
Herbst (two phase) Xbow (two phase) Forsus on arch wire (single phase)
Clinical Use of the Xbow Appliance
The Xbow is made up of a maxillary expansion appliance, the Triple "L" ArchTM, the 3M Unitek Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device EZ Module (Left Side Order #885-138, Right Side Order #885-139, Direct Push Rod 25 mm Right Side Order #885-112, Left Side Order #885-111), and Gurin locks (3M Unitek large size Order #560-400). Don't forget to order a Gurin lock wrench.
Ask for the Dentaurum "Variety" one leg expansion screw. There is less chance of palatal impingement with distal tipping and intrusion of the first molars than with a two leg screw design. If the patient has a posterior crossbite or crowding because of a narrow maxilla, expand the maxilla first. It also makes it easier in some cases to attach the Forsus devices if you expand the maxilla first. If more than 12 mm of expansion is necessary use a SuperScrew. Band the upper 6’s and the upper 4’s to prevent the upper 6’s from tipping too much. Control of the upper first bicuspids is important if the goal is overcorrection and the bite-catching effect of the first bicuspids. If the treatment plan involves serial extraction of all four first bicuspids, band the upper e’s or 5’s, and 6’s.
Fit the bands and take an alginate impression. Place the bands in the impression and secure with sticky wax. Pour the impression and check the band position before sending the case to the lab.
The next most accurate method is to fit the bands but remove them before taking the impression. Pour the model and send with the bands separately. The lab will place your bands on the model. Use this method with VPS impression material if you want the lab to pour the model. Don't try to take an impression of the bands on the teeth with VPS. It's difficult enough trying to get those impressions out of the mouth WITHOUT bands. Don't forget to replace the separators.
Use occlusal headgear tubes on the upper 6’s to attach the Forsus device springs.
Once space is gained from the expansion, use upper 2x4 mechanics, if necessary. After alignment, segment the archwire to maintain the incisors. This allows over-correction of the Class II buccal segments without over-retraction of the upper incisors.
If the upper incisors are well aligned and the maxilla doesn't need expanding initially, cement the maxillary expander and the Triple "L" Arch at the same time and place the springs immediately or one week later. If you need to expand the maxilla first, wait to cement the Triple "L" Arch until you are ready to attach the springs.
Microetch the bands and occlusal rests just before cementation. We use the UnitekTM Multi-Cure Glass Ionomer Band Cement from 3M Unitek. This powder-liquid cement has a long working time and on demand light cure. We rarely have a loose band. Bond the occlusal rests with FiltekTM Supreme Plus Flowable Restorative from 3M ESPE. If the upper second molars have erupted bond an occlusal rest to prevent the first molars from intruding too much. Occlusal rests for the maxillary second molars can be placed even if they are just erupting and still mostly covered with soft tissue. The rest can be placed at the level of the soft tissue so that when the second molar erupts further the rest will contact the occlusal surface. It is not necessary to bond the rest in this case.
If there is an interference between an upper tooth and the lower labial bow or Gurin Lock, bond FiltekTM Supreme Plus Flowable Restorative to the occlusal surface of the lower first molars to open the bite.
If the labial bow is too close to the gingiva of the lower incisors use a three prong plier posteriorly to raise it. If the buccal section of the labial bow is too close to the teeth and the pushrod is hung up then use the three prong from the occlusal on the spot with the least clearance to bow out the wire.
To open the pushrod loop enough to place it on the labial bow simply push a bird beak far enough into the loop and squeeze the tips together through the opening. To remove the rod from the labial bow take the end with your fingers and flip it anteriorly so that the labial bow passes through the loop opening.
See the patient every six weeks and overcorrect the maxillary first bicuspid to a half cusp Class III.


Half cusp overcorrection of first bicuspids after 4 months Xbow

"Bite-catching" by first bicuspids after rebound (7 months post Forsus)
The use of the Forsus device causes rapid over-correction, usually in four to five months for a full cusp Class II. Fully compress the springs by distalizing the Gurin locks with the Gurin lock wrench. If you don't keep the spring compressed it will flop around, wing out buccally causing sores, and increase the chances of the patient biting on it and causing distortion. A properly compressed spring will also stay active longer as the patient opens. A fully compressed Forsus device has 200 grams of force and looses 20 grams for every 1 mm of deactivation. If you run out of length on the labial bow to reactivate the spring then you can either place crimpable stops on the pushrod or replace the pushrod with a longer one.
Once overcorrection has been achieved remove the springs and Gurin locks and start maxillary expansion, if necessary. Test the stability of the Class II correction for a couple of months and replace the springs on one or both sides, if necessary. The goal is a socked-in Class I first bicuspid so the best time to start is after the first bicuspids erupt. If the lower e's have not exfoliated cut the labial bow and occlusal rests off with a high speed.
We overcorrect maxillary expansion depending on the amount of constriction. If there is a complete bilateral crossbite we overcorrect the upper molars into a buccal crossbite. If the crossbite is unilateral we overcorrect the non-crossbite side into a buccal crossbite. If there is a crossbite tendency as a result of Class II correction we overcorrect the molars until the lingual cusp tip of the upper molar contacts the buccal cusp tip of the lower molar on one side. We leave the RME in place to retain the expansion for an additional five months. This gives us the opportunity to check for Class II relapse two months after completing expansion and replacing the Forsus device on one or both sides.
Xbow Comfort
To address the issue of comfort, I went to Sandra Ipsen of Comfort Solutions. Orthodontists are contacting Comfort Solutions after their patients experience sores. I recommend that you start with anterior and posterior spring caps and have Spi-Wrap on hand. Spi-Wrap is spiral cut tubing that works well for sores from the lower labial bow as well as transpalatal arches. Comfort Solutions offers these items together in a Xbow kit (Order #4201). Great Lakes Orthodontics will supply the end caps if you check the option on the lab prescription. For buccal mucosa sores place two anterior caps, one on the spring and one on the pushrod. Another option is to change the pushrod from 25 mm to 29 mm and use back to back 4 mm Herbst screw caps from Comfort Solutions. This moves the impinging corner of the pushrod anteriorly away from the sore.

Double anterior caps on 25 mm pushrod for buccal mucosa sore (most commonly used with a straight pushrod to keep the caps away from the gingiva)
Back to back 4 mm Herbst screw caps on 29 mm push rod
If you run out of room to reactivate the Forsus device or if the distal end of the spring is impinging then switch to a mesial hook-up using the same 25 mm pushrod and an "L" pin instead of the EZ Module.
Mesial headgear tube pin insertion (note rotated Gurin lock for comfort)
For small mouths we use the "Shorty Hook-Up". Use the XXL Pushrod (38 mm) which comes without a stop and cut it to fit. This is done by completely compressing the spring with the 38 mm pushrod (out of the mouth) and cutting the pushrod at the distal end of the spring. Use an "L" pin instead of an EZ Module and insert the pin in the headgear tube from the mesial.
Shorty Hook-Up
Pushrod Adjustments
EZ Module has decreased the need for pushrod adjustments to keep the loop from interfering with the cheek or gingiva. In many cases no adjustment is needed. The first and most common adjustment is the lingual tuck-in bend to prevent the "elbows out" cheek impingement by the pushrod (see below). The second adjustment, if necessary, is the step-out or bayonet bend. The bayonet bend is used most often in patients with small mandibular arches where the pushrod hooks up further anteriorly around the curve of the arch and the spring needs to be stepped out to avoid interference with the gingiva. As the Forsus device is reactivated with distalization of the maxillary buccal segment the pushrod sometimes needs to be readjusted to prevent gingival impingement by the rod. The adjustment bend in the rod needs to be more pronounced the more mesial the rod is due to the curvature in the arch.
In most cases we use the short 25 mm pushrod to keep the Gurin lock distal to the Obicularis Oris muscle, preventing sores.
If the patient develops a sore adjacent to the anterior end of the pushrod try the following: 1. Distalize the Gurin Lock to compress the spring fully. This may move the lock and Forsus device distally enough to reduce the soft tissue impingement. If not this is still the best position to observe the relationship of the Forsus device to the soft tissue. 2. If the pushrod is impinging on the gingiva, move the Gurin lock mesially, remove the rod from the spring but leave it on the labial bow. Use a three prong plier to remove some or all of the adjustment bend. The lingual tuck-in bend determines the position of the loop relative to the soft tissue. Bend the distal end of the rod buccally to rotate the loop away from the gingiva. Bending the distal end of the rod lingually will rotate the loop towards the gingiva. 3. Rotate the Gurin locks 90 degrees to present a round surface to the cheek. 4. Use Comfort Caps as above.
Lingual Tuck-In Bend. With a 25 mm pushrod the bend is distal to the stop. On the 29 mm pushrod the bend is mesial to the stop.
25 mm Straight Rod, Lingual Tuck-In Bend (distal to stop), Bayonet Bend

Straight Rod Lingual Tuck-In Bend Bayonet Bend
Video courtesy of Dr. Bob Miller.
A problem that we are seeing with the new EZ Module is interference with lower molar brackets or gingiva. In these cases we remove the anti-rotation arm on the EZ module to allow it to roll out.

With and without anti-rotation arm
Forsus and Full Edgewise
In most moderate to severe non-extraction or borderline extraction Class II cases I use a two phase approach with the Xbow. With the borderline extraction cases if the case becomes too protrusive in phase two we then extract. In an extraction case we begin with headgear and start Class II elastics as soon as rectangular stainless steel arch wires are placed and space closure is begun. In deep bite cases we add a bite turbo as soon as there is incisor contact. Once the lower spaces are closed we decide whether to finish with headgear and elastics or place Forsus. The reason I use headgear and elastics is twofold. First, I don't like to wait to begin Class II mechanics until I have placed rectangular stainless steel arch wires and closed the lower spaces. You may be missing out on growth, especially in late eruption or early maturing females. Second, in a deep bite case you want the posterior eruption that elastics give. Forsus is vertically neutral.
I use the same principles when using the Forsus device with a full edgewise appliance as I do with Xbow. Use the 25 mm Direct Pushrod distal to the lower first bicuspid instead of the canine, if possible. This keeps the Forsus device more compact and moves it distal to the anterior curvature of the arch, preventing sores. The only difference is you cannot fully compress the spring with an edgewise appliance if you use a bracket as the anterior stop. If you do be prepared to rebond the bracket. Don't forget to steel tie the first bicuspids. Reactivate the springs with crimpable stops on the rods or use longer rods.
Dr. Bob Miller hooks up the pushrod using an Alastic KX module to activate the spring but at the same time remove the force from the canine or first bicuspid bracket. (see below). Place the springs and pushrods as you would normally but don't close the loop yet. Make the pushrod adjustments leaving 1mm of play in the spring, remove the pushrod, pre-stretch a KX-1 module, place the KX module on the pushrod, place the pushrod on the archwire, close the loop, hook the KX module to the first molar hook using floss and a floss threader over the second bicuspid bracket and down between the second bicuspid and first molar, then place the pushrod in the spring. This completely activates the spring without debonding the canine or first bicuspid bracket. If we place the 25 mm pushrod distal to the first bicuspid we use a KX-1 module. We also use a KX-1 module distal to the canine in a bicuspid extraction case or a severe Class II. A 38 mm pushrod (no stop) cut down to the length of a compressed spring is used if a 25 mm pushrod is too long (see below).
Alastic KX-1 module placed with floss threader

Alastic KX-1 module and lingual tuck-in pushrod adjustment
Alastic KX-1 module hook-up distal to canine (severe Class II, patient decided against mandibular advancement surgery after preparation)

Alastic KX-1 Module hook-up distal to first bicuspid

Alastic KX-1 Module hook-up distal to canine (bicuspid extraction) with a 38 mm pushrod (no stop) cut to fit (25 mm pushrod was too long)

Modified Mouth Guard with Slots for Forsus Device
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xbow Cases


5 months Xbow (8 months after Forsus removal)
post phase one, Edgewise appliances have not been used
Superimposition below



Impacted canine, retained primary canine 1. Extract primary canine, 2. Xbow (3 months Forsus Device right,
6 months Forsus Device left), 3. RME
post phase one, Edgewise appliances have not been used


1. 2X4 7 months post Forsus, post phase one
2. Xbow (4 months Forsus Device) Full edgewise appliances have not been used


1. Xbow (4 months Forsus device) 6 months post Forsus
2. RME post phase one
Edgewise appliances have not been used


1. Xbow (4.5 months Forsus) 9 months post Forsus, post phase one
2. RME Edgewise appliances have not been used
3. Replace Forsus (1.5 months) Cephs below

Initial ceph 2 months post Forsus, lingual arch in place


Xbow and Upper 2X4 Post Xbow (Full edgewise appliances have not been used)



Xbow 4 months Post Xbow 1 year Full Edgewise Appliances (treated by Dr. Lesley Williams)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Indirect Bonding
The March, 2007 issue of "Seminars in Orthodontics" features indirect bonding and includes an article written by this author6 .
I have been informing other indirect bonders of a new tray system that I have been using and thought it would be easier to just summarize the technique on this website. As many of you know I have been involved with indirect bonding since 1981 when my mentor Dr. Michael Wainwright of Vancouver, B.C. taught me the technique which he pioneered.









_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Combination
Active
Anteriors
Passive
Posteriors
The CAAPP Gun (Incisor Alignment Spring Theory)
Think of engaging a light round niti arch wire into crowded incisors as activating a spring. In order for the arch wire to work out and the incisors to align efficiently the arch wire must be able to feed through the canine and bicuspid passive self-ligating brackets and molar tubes with as little friction or resistance to sliding as possible. In order to get maximum activation with the lightest force arch wires they must be ligated to the base of the slots in the incisor brackets. This is analogous to cocking the trigger of a gun. If passive self-ligating brackets are used on the incisors and the arch wire is not ligated to the base of the slots the spring is not completely activated due to the play between the initial light round arch wire and the slot. In that case the trigger is "half-cocked". There is ten degrees of play between an .014 arch wire and an .0275 inch slot. Two .014 arch wires can piggy back in an .0275 inch slot.
Most of the initial first order movement of crowded incisors is in the labial direction, either tipping of the crowns or derotation. If the arch wire is not ligated to the base of the incisor bracket slots there is a loss of the labial activation force. This is analogous to squeezing a tube of toothpaste with two extra holes. Some of the toothpaste squeezes out the nozzle but some also squeezes out the other two holes. The force is dissipated in three directions instead of one. If passive self-ligating brackets are used on the incisors without ligatures then a dimpled arch wire or crimpable stops are necessary to prevent the arch wire from being squeezed sideways. This introduces another force system on the bracket that the dimple or stop contacts. This can result in an anterior space opening which requires the placement of power chain to close.
CAAPP is a system of brackets with the following goals.
1. Creating a “Long Buccal Tube” for low friction arch wire feeding with passive self-ligating brackets on the canines and bicuspids, and tubes on the molars.
2. Getting the most movement of the incisors with the least force with traditional twin brackets and a light round niti arch wire ligated to the base of the slot ("All or None Ligation", "Targeting Incisor Activation")
3. Patient comfort.
4. Respecting patient's request for colored ligatures on their incisors.
The SmartClip bracket from 3M Unitek was chosen as the best bracket for the canines and bicuspids for the following reasons.
Traditional twin brackets (Standard Victory Series, 3M Unitek) are used on the incisors for the following reasons.
CAAPP Tips
.
Comments on what passive is and isn't.
1. Passive allows easier sliding for canine retraction, posterior space closure, and incisor advancement in non-extraction cases.
2. There is less resistance to movement (ski wax or parking brake analogy) with fewer interruptions of movement.
3. We are still using the same basic forces to move teeth, i.e. the same arch wires but broader arch forms, the same elastic chain, the same springs, the same elastics. Brackets don't move teeth. Forces move teeth. The only force that has changed with passive is the braking force from ligatures which is estimated to be approximately 50 grams. We can move teeth with 50 grams less force with passive self-ligating brackets. We can also move teeth with an .012 niti arch wire which delivers about 50 grams of force. If the .012 niti arch wire was used with ligatures on the canines and bicuspids there would not be enough force to overcome the braking force from the ligatures and very little tooth movement would occur.
4. The big change was nickel titanium arch wires. Passive just allows more efficient use of nickel titanium. Broader arch forms in nickel titanium have allowed us to treat more borderline extraction cases non-extraction. This allows us to assess whether or not the case is too protrusive before we make the extraction decision. If we decide to extract late in treatment we can close the spaces faster than we have been able to in the past.
5. We still need to extract in some cases. Head gear is still useful. An arch wire cannot exert the same direction of force as an RME for sutural expansion. Dr. Ricketts reminded us that the majority of patients can be treated non-extraction decades ago. He taught us that constricted mandibular arches could be expanded to match a suturally expanded maxillary arch. But don't throw away that retainer.
Over and Under Elastic Chain





7 months alignment with .014 and .018 niti (day of .014X.025 niti placement, .018 CAPP)
References
1. Casko J, Shepherd W. Dental and Skeletal Variation Within the Range of Normal. Angle Orthod 1984; 54: 5-17.
2. Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM. Predicting and preventing root resorption: part II. Treatment factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:511-5.
5. Brin I. Tulloch C. Koroluk L. Philips C. External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: A retrospective review of 1- versus 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124:151-6.
6. Higgins D. Indirect Bonding with Light-Cured Adhesive and a Hybrid Transfer Tray. Semin Orthod 2007;13:64-68.
3. Sondhi, Anoop: Efficient and Effective Indirect Bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:352-9.
4. Kalange J: Ideal appliance placement with APC brackets and indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 33:516-526, 1999
8. Miles P, Weyant R, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 480-485.
9. Harris D, Jones A, Darendeliler A. Volumetric analysis of root resorption craters after application of controlled intrusive light and heavy orthodontic forces: A microcomputed tomography scan study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 639-647.
Credit to Sandra Ipsen of Comfort Solutions for Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device adjustment and photography, Wendy Schock for photography,
and Libby Pearson of Delta Orthodontic Technical Services for artistic wirebending
Herbst is a trademark of Dentaurum, Inc.
APC, Filtek, Forsus, SmartClip, Transbond, and Unitek are trademarks of 3M Company.
Crossbow, Xbow, Triple "L" Arch and "Straight to the Target when Straight is the Target" are trademarks of Dr. Duncan W. Higgins.